top of page

DISSERTATION

Every Saturday morning at eight o’clock for the first ten to twelve years of my life my dad would stand by the front door and announce that he was walking down to our local co-op. He always returned with a bag full of pastries and his paper of choice; The Times, and on a Saturday The Times has many pull away segments due to the increased amount of reading time a reader has over the weekend. Every Saturday, he would sit down with a cuppa, the newspaper, a pastry, and start cynically depicting all he could find, whilst chuckling at the occasional satirical cartoon.

These newspapers became a big part of these my investigation, and they were my first experience of the news. After a glorious chocolate twist, I always reached out with gooey fingers and grabbed the Saturday review, and week in, week out, I carefully scanned the TV guide making sure to note when there was something on. After, I always grabbed the glossy magazine that came tucked into the newspaper and flicked to the cartoon page, looking at all the caricatures and comics with a grin that did not quite understand what it was grinning at. After, satisfied, I would put them down, having consumed my news for the week.

Now obviously, times have changed. Thankfully, I am much more interested in aspects of the news other than cartoons and tv guides, and because of new technology I do not need to grab the paper, I can look at my phone and its numerous news apps. In recent years, with hot topics like Brexit, Coronavirus, and Donald Trump dominating stories, it is more and more interesting to read.

So, when it came to starting my personal investigation, I wanted to combine my interest in the news with my art, and thought it would be interesting to go back to my initial experience of newspapers and stories and expand it - leading to my question; How does Art carry a message in the media? My mood board at the start encompasses many images which will crop up later, but initially I put down all artists and images that I could think of that involved itself with art in the news to get some ideas rolling. Next, I started to think about the idea of how satire has changed throughout time, influenced by my realisation that how I viewed the news has changed. During my research, I realised satire and propaganda have intermingled, and what followed were examples satire and propaganda that have existed throughout history. It was interesting to note how important events (i.e the world wars) influenced how much the two mingled, but also how much has changed. These days, satire is much more colourful, and not restricted to the newspaper. TV shows that I have watched and enjoyed are satire of everyday life, and propaganda still exists everywhere.

After, I began a search for an artist with a satirical edge and discovered Shirin Neshat, a photographer who includes herself, her culture, and a message in every work she produces. She was born in Iran but has not been allowed to visit in recent years, and therefore had to find a way to reflect Iran in her artwork. I chose her art because she always carried a message, whether that be supporting women’s revolution, or talking about her sense of ‘home’.

Initially, I made some very ‘pretty’ primary source photos in the same style of Neshat, however they did not truly reflect her work and the messages she includes. They worked well aesthetically, so I decided to bring that element forward, but to create a second set of photos which had an element of satire and propaganda I knew I had to think on. The whole reason I had chosen to research her was because of the deep symbolic message of home she creates in every piece of work, and I had only shadowed her style. Her work always packed a punch, especially in Speechless 1996 where she has it printed out life size, so a gun is pointing at the stomach of the viewer. So, I had to think of a message, and a purpose to the photographs. An interesting twist on her ideas could be I wasn’t in a position where I couldn’t return home instead, I was stuck in my home.

I decided the second set of photos would revolve around the light, and what purpose it has in the photos. This thought process occurred during lockdown, so everything from the outside world was coming through technology; friends, jobs, and exercise was all being transferred online, and we had to learn a new way of living. So, this was what I used as a basis for my next set of photos. All the light came from devices. Everything from the outside world was light. My mum teaching, my sister exercising – the only source of light came from electronics – or the window to the outside. These photos were influenced by Neshat but were much more my own, and I knew I had created a set of satirical photographs. I was pleased with the result, and realised I had employed the use of chiaroscuro, the definition of which is “the treatment of light and shade in drawing and painting.” I thought the photos I had taken were like the cartoons from when I was younger, just black and white and slightly more subtle.

However, there was no reason that I could not add that staple of satire (the bright colours) into these photos, and I went forward with a few experiments. I cut out the Arabic letters on the kitchen role and put red paper underneath to add more emphasis to the physical words and suggest perhaps something more is underneath. Perhaps the red is my sister trying to speak out, and she is blocked in parts by the mask over her face. Then, to raise the letters on the mask, I sewed over the top, emphasising the letters themselves as Neshat focused so heavily on her calligraphy to provide restricted women with a voice. I think there is a lot to be said when it comes to voices being heard, and as I completed these experiments I thought more and more about fake news, or restricted news, and how these photos do not only link to coronavirus; the mask can represent repressed voices blocked by the media.

My work with thread linked to Anzeri, an Italian who sews over vintage photographs he collects in old stores. When I first saw Anzeri’s work, I loved it, but loved it further when I read around it. His aim with his work is to bring life back into these vintage photographs he finds. He makes these people into living and breathing graphic symbols, almost back to life. I thought that was wonderful, and, directly inspired by his efforts, I sewed over the top of one of my Neshat photos. The thread was very thin, but I liked the concept. Bringing it forward, it could be used to symbolise masks and restricted voices, but, for the moment, worked well as bringing bright and vibrant colour into my otherwise black and white photos.

Having done this, I decided to make my own caricatures, but before I began, I sent off an email to Morten Morland, the cartoonist for The Times, with some questions. I had no expectation that he would reply, but he did, and he decided to go into great depth. Reading his reply, which you can find under the ‘Caricatures’ section of this website, taught me so much about not only his attitudes towards satire in the media, but many others in his field. His attitudes towards politics, where the ‘line’ is, his influences, how he works, how he chooses to create a cartoon – they all helped me understand just a bit more about what satire and propaganda can be. He also went on to drop a few nuggets of genius:

“I think cartoons help distil often complex issues into easily understood snapshots of the debate.”

             

“laughing at those in power when they mess things up, is healthy, even essential for democracy.” 

 

“the main thing is about pricking the egos of those in power. It’s important to have SOMETHING to say. You can spot the cartoons that haven’t straight away.”

So, what was I trying to say?

With my Neshat work, my first set of photos had nothing to say, but for the second set I had ended up taking pictures that spoke about a lock down experience, the light being the only access into the outside world. What, then, was I to draw?

I did not decide straight away; I took some time experimenting. I copied some of Morland’s Theresa May figures, thinking about all the different ways he had composed her. I splashed blue ink on the top, the same colour as her infamous jacket, and liked how the colour was not restricted within the lines I had drawn. In a way, it resembled the sewing I had done; abstract patterns over non-abstract figures. Next, I knew what I would struggle with most is the faces of anyone I drew, and I needed to practice. I pulled up four big political figures and drew some very basic outlines of their faces. They were simple, almost too much so, but they helped me understand the proportions of different faces.

Up until this point, stuck at home, I had mostly focused on my family for inspiration. Creating work that revolved around people would, ultimately, was easier if I were using the people that I was ‘trapped’ with. And what followed was no different. Morland had talking about enhancing aspects of the people he was drawing, and so when approaching my mum, I decided that she should be playing her oboe.

I tried to incorporate different media into the subsequent caricatures, and trialled several different media including coloured pencil and watercolour. The results were colourful and ‘funky’, and they certainly made my mum laugh, but they were quite static – unmoving. Not like Morland’s fluid, diverse caricatures. I encountered a similar problem with my brother – although this time I created links back to Anzeri by sewing abstract shapes over the top of his face. This, like Anzeri often did, released the stationary portrait, and gave it a different layer. Again, I liked what I saw, and this was by far the most successful caricature I had created.

Following this success, I wanted to create more but knew, to do so successfully, I would need some primary source photos. This was when I discovered Richard Billingham, a British photographer who has used his background and past to propel his art forward. He came from a home with an Alcoholic father, abusive mother, and helpless baby brother. When he was a child, he took photos which captured the essence of his home; smoke covered, leaning over puzzles, food on laps as they watch TV. The photos are borderline satirical, and he went forward to make his own movie titled ‘Ray & Liz’. When I watched it, I noticed immediately that every shot was taken with care and made to look interesting. It was without doubt a photographer’s movie, although often hard to watch because of the material it dealt with.

It could be argued that the link between Billingham’s tragic-comic family photos and my unit thus far is strenuous, but I thought his photos, especially his ‘Ray’s a Laugh’ collection linked well to the photos that I wanted to take. The ‘comic’ of ‘tragic-comic’ would become more prominent and enhancing the consequent photos with thread would bring them to life in a way that my drawings did not. I took a lot of photos with Billingham’s style, trying to capture the essence of what occurred in my home on a day-to-day basis. I tried to ‘caricaturize’ each person I took a picture of, to make it so they could be a Morland drawing. I made my sister wear her uniform backwards to shadow both her untidiness and her current ‘backward’ school life. My mum’s messiness and my dad’s ongoing obsession with bicycles helped me create almost caricatures in photo format, and I thought they worked well. The final set of photos were family shots – but much more colloquial than any of the old photos Billingham had worked on top of. I realised that that difference in formality could be interesting, so I put filters on my modern photos giving them an aged touch.

This created an interesting contrast between the relaxed formality typical in modern photos, and the static rigidity common in old photos that Anzeri uses, where people had to remain still for the picture to be taken. So, with the success of the sewing behind me, I went to use these photos to create a resolved piece.

It involved 6 mini pieces. Like Anzeri, the thread became a way for me to change and manipulate my images; a tool to bring life into stationary photographs. Each piece encompassed something I had covered so far:

The first piece was me sewing over each of my family’s faces bringing them forward and linking back to the caricatures I made from thread. The colours I used over each family member are colours I associate to them subconsciously. Next, I cut out my brother and did a single line drawing of him, linking to the fluidity of my ink experiments and the more standard cartoons that are physical pictures. Other pieces involved me sewing over my mother’s hand and ripping people out of images, each with a different message.

The thread could symbolise 2 things: masks and restricted voices, but also the linking of my different family members and bringing them out the photo to tie them all together. It was a series of pieces that I thought worked well to reflect what I had accomplished so far and looked great presented on a piece of mount board.

The next logical step in my mind was to now research how propaganda can have a large impact on its onlookers. Its purpose, by definition, is to carry a message, but I never realised the wide variety that has existed through time and around the world. After research into artists like John Heartfield I and Shepard Fairey, I discovered the Russian Avant Garde. What really interested me was how artists like Rodchenko used angular lines in all his work to convey his message. In a simple book shop sign, the angles and shapes meant so much more than just a pretty pattern; they were a message; a symbol. A language to the onlookers that only they could speak.

So, I researched further into Rodchenko’s work, initially copying his bookshop sign, then adapting it for the modern day. I used the coronavirus and the NHS as an immediate inspiration, as throughout Corona it has become commonplace to see banners and posters plastered against walls promoting and praising the NHS. I used a real, tactile mask in one instance to add a 3D component to the poster, but always making sure the angular lines were constantly involved. I created a negative opposite, inversing the picture and colours with a condemnatory message to show propaganda can go both ways. Then, the image with clapping hands. I liked this a lot, with the lines of Rodchenko forming windows from which clapping occurs. I had to bear in mind this all had to be simplistic, bold, colours like a poster carrying a simple message.

I then tried to transfer this to a digital platform, which had limited success. The resources at my disposal were not fantastic, but I did manage to add a 3D element to the poster, which I liked. Pushing the more important segments forward meant they were more ‘in your face’ and stressed more the message of the poster, whilst also pushing other elements back. This could mean I could create layers of different messages, some agreeing and some opposing.

I then decided to leave the UK. In Russia, one black and white piece and one proudly showing off the Russian flag only having Putin’s face showing through a circular hole reflected the media’s stories. An initial impression of a bright and healthy Russia before revealing the true story of what was occurring. Russia initially told the world they were having little cases and deaths, before revealing the truth.

When it came to creating a final piece for my research into Rodchenko, I wanted to utilise the layered effect I had just been working with, pushing information up and into the face of the onlooker. Of course, I had to keep the angular lines in place, and the success of the NHS clapping experiment meant I wanted to include hands in there also.

Eventually I created a piece that had different elements protruding. The word ‘protect’ pulled right from the government coronavirus propaganda and the latter half of the word was raised, stressing the part of the word that would be stressed whilst shouting. I used a Neshat photo as the figure shouting out, as I thought it contrasted well with the loud bold colourful backdrop. In the photo my sister is scared and uncertain from inside, just like the hands were clapping and praising from inside. It showed both the positives and negatives of the NHS response, but still very much being Rodchkeno style of simplistic and bold.

Finally, it was time to start concluding all my ideas, and start building towards a finale. Everything thus far had been news and media related, and so my mind immediately went to the idea of presenting work on a newspaper-like model. After hours of research, I found an artist called Kirsty Whitlock who uses thread, newspapers, bags, train tickets – anything she can find – to create her work. She explores throwaway culture; bringing life back into items we throw away.

Physically, the materials Whitlock uses link to what I have been working with, but also thematically her work links to looking for deeper meaning inside newspapers and materialistic items, restoring life into these items, and exploiting their often-overlooked qualities.

As a response, I combined two newspapers with thread, highlighting only parts of headlines that told a different story when separated from the title. Next, I went to a field and started putting newspapers in different areas that they would be discarded like in a puddle and on a park bench. The newspapers, in this situation, looked great as a response to Whitlock’s work, and I wanted to replicate this.

So, I started by dipping various materials in pottery plaster, and moulding them to mock the shapes created in my primary source photos. Not only did this look unique, but it provided me with a solid surface for me to work on top of. In a way it was solidifying and immortalising what would previously have been thrown away. I created lots of experiments, using thicker and then thinner plaster, and then working with thread.

Mod podge is a transfer glue which transfers onto paper or card and so I tried transferring pictures from my unit onto these models. Admittedly, the plaster was not the greatest surface for the mod podge. Often, more of the image was taken away than left behind. However, this did create a ‘discarded’ effect. Some of my Neshat photographs managed to remain in place, and I liked how these clean, sharp images were left clinging to the discarded newspapers.

The time came to then assemble a final piece. In my experimentation, thread had always been a successful way of showing or hiding different elements, but for my final piece I wanted to use it in a more tactile fashion. I wanted it physically to tie all the elements together, whilst symbolically enhancing them in a response to throwaway culture.

Whilst experimenting with different cloths and materials, I tried dipping newspaper itself into the plaster. Initially, it formed a crumpled ball. But, after layering up the newspaper and making the plaster lighter, it held its shape. This meant that some of the elements of the final piece could actually be bits of discarded newspaper. I intentionally chose parts of a newspaper that would be thrown away almost the next day; TV guides that are only relevant for 24 hours whilst also tying back to my initial experience with the news featured heavily.

In the most basic sense, my final resolved piece answers my question by tying all the bits and pieces of my unit together. Neshat’s satire, Morland’s caricatures, Rodchenko’s propaganda – all ways in which art is expressed and carries a message. The plaster and thread immortalise the messages, whilst tying them altogether.

However, my final piece is more complicated. It suggests that messages are fleeting. Rodchenko’s message is out of date; Morland’s message changes from piece to piece. This is what Whitlock was dealing with: throwaway culture. It could be argued that child me was an accurate representation of the effect art in the news has – little.

Most people who read the news read it to educate themselves. Messages that do go through are often subliminal and fleeting. So, despite the plaster, thread, and my attempt to immortalize the messages in the media, all the artists and art in the media I have explored only carries a message temporarily. The sagging thread, the discarded mod podge, and the crumpled paper shows that the messages carried in the news are temporary in all the forms I have investigated.  

bottom of page